iBroadway

Archive for January, 2009

A Matter of Rant or Wrong

Have you been following the tale of Patti Lupone’s shouty episode with a picture-taking audience member? Here’s the audio clip (which is on Youtube, which seems sort of  ironic, but whatever):

Obviously this begs the question about questionable behavior during live performances, doesn’t it? That “no photography of any kind” rule includes “no recording devices,” so unless the person who captured this is exceptionally quick to recognize a newsworthy moment, he or she was flouting the very same rules as the snapper. Both are wrong, true, and listening in like this  does make us culpable in the act,  but it’s still pretty fun to hear La Lupone going off on this lout, isn’t it?

Here’s the interesting thing: Take a look at some of the comments from this blog post about the incident on the Gay TV blog.

First of all, wow, these are some vituperative people, some of whom clearly have no understanding of what they were even listening to, but sure are ready to sling some serious smack about a famous person.

Second, boy, do theatre folk get sanctimonious, particularly about their sacred cows (no insult to the lady in question intended).

Third, I just don’t understand the urge to snap photos–or make recordings–of entertainment events. For what? Was that guy going to try to sell crappy cell phone pictures of Lupone on Ebay?  Was the recorder planning to make a cd of the show? (Before he realized he could post the show-stopping episode on Youtube, naturally.) Is there really a market for this kind of thing, or are they planning to gaze/listen to their blurry/mostly inaudible contraband in the privacy of their lonely rooms? Whichever, it’s just kind of sad.

Fourth, full disclosure, I detest people who do stuff like this and have been known to personally, publicly and not-very-nicely request them to desist, so I’m pretty much on Patty’s page here (ha).

The Blair Witch Project: 10 Years Later

Rotten Tomatoes posted a video celebrating the 10th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, the brilliant and terrifying horror movie that opened back in 1999 ( I saw the movie twice in the theater the first weekend it opened. I was twelve at the time. I remember going to see it with my older brother and I can’t imagine my parents knew he was taking me to see it).

What makes this post relevant to Art Meets Commerce is that The Blair Witch Project was really the first movie to use full advantage of what the internet had to offer (and this was well before web 2.0!). I remember sitting at my computer (Windows ‘95! AOL 7.2!) and watching whatever new video would be posted on the website and follow the story of the three missing film students. Not only was the preview terrifying but people thought that it was in fact a real documentary and three students did actually go missing.

By creating a very comprehensive website with maps, footage, and stories about the witch that haunted the woods outside Burkittsville, Maryland,  The Blair Witch Project marketing team managed to capture the attention of an audience. They were able to keep them coming back for more and blur the lines between fiction and reality. Brilliant.

Money, Money, Money, Money

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pound ought and six, result misery.”

That’s what Charles Dickens wrote about money and budgeting in David Copperfield. Simplistic, but true. Unfortunately, as we know, theatre and arts organizations of all kinds are contemplating a pretty miserable forecast for this year, and next, and . . .  oh, who can say when it will end?

Necessity being mother of fundraising, people are starting to get creative about using the power of the internet to expand on the usual (and ubiquitous) year-end appeal. AMC client, Terry Greiss, Executive Director of the Irondale Center, created a video appeal in an effort to shore up their faltering finances, blasted it,  posted it on Youtube and uploaded it to their website. The campaign got picked up by the Daily News and the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, which we’re all hoping will  help get the word out and the dollars in.

In other news, the Times ran an article the other day on the bigger (BIGGER!) picture in arts funding, i.e. the American Recovery and Reinvestment bill, which includes a $50 million supplement for the N.E.A. to distribute directly to nonprofit arts organizations and also through state and local arts agencies. No way is this enough (is there ever enough?), but at least it offers a ray of hope that the arts will reclaim some part of the national agenda. Lord knows, they’ve been absent from the national political stage (except as a punching bag) for far too long.

The Power of Movement and Silence

There are moments in theater that make a show go from good to extraordinary. For me, those moments happen when nothing is said, when a character is alone on stage and for that moment you are there with him or her in that world. Those moments rarely happen.

People applauded Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon for his drunken Nixon monologue (rightfully so), but for me the moment is when Nixon knows he is stuck in a corner and realizes that he has to admit his wrongdoing. There are no words, just Nixon and Frost on stage in silence, with Nixon’s face on the TV screens with the look of horror. That sent chills up my spine. A brilliant theatrical moment.

I had the opportunity to see Billy Elliot on Sunday afternoon. To be perfectly honest,  I was never excited about this show coming to Broadway and I thought it would be just another tourist trap. I had seats in center rear mezzanine and to me seats far back can ruin a show. To my pleasant surprise, I loved it, I thought it was wonderful and although it’s  very large (the cast is the biggest I have seen in a long time for a commercial production), it feels surprising intimate in the very large Imperial Theater.

To me what made Billy Elliot good was not the music (it was fine, but nothing to write home about), but the story, dance and lighting design. I haven’t seen the movie, but I just loved the story of Billy’s struggle to find himself in a narrow-minded community. The dancing was fantastic and the lighting design was amazing. Billy Elliot had two moments that, for me, made the show go from good to extraordinary.

Billy Elliot on Broadway

Both scenes occur act the end of the acts (spoiler alert!). The Act One finale is a long sequence with Billy  dancing alone while riots occur behind him. It’s a chilling moment that beats out any flying witches or crashing chandeliers. There’s no song, just Billy expressing his frustration through dance. The other moment occurs at the end of Act Two when Billy says goodbye to his best friend, Michael, who rides a bike to the spotlit center of the darkened stage. You do not see Michael’s face, he is alone, watching  his friend achieve his dream while he is left behind in a community that is crumbling. In the silence it is just Michael and in a moment Billy runs up to embrace his friend, probably for the last time.

Word Wealth

Wasn’t it a odd on Tuesday when President Obama, who is usually the smoothest of the smoothies, had that little stutter step during the oath? (Wasn’t his fault, natch, but still, it’s the only glitch I recall in the ceremony. In fact, when you watch it you see that inquisitive twinkle in his eye as he gazes at Chief Justice Roberts.  He clearly knows what the problem is, clearly knows that it’s not appropriate to correct the guy giving you the, uh, presidential oath of office in front of  ten kerjillion people, then clearly figures, what the hey, better keep marching–it’ll get sorted later.)

So take look at this Op-Ed piece from the Times. As an admitted grammar snoot, I confess to “correcting” split infinitives in manuscripts I’ve edited over the years (and I’ll probably still avoid them mulishly in my own writing–take that, Mr. Pinker!),  so I read it with a smile–and maybe a dash of defensiveness, who doesn’t love a hoary old  shibboleth or two?

The piece  is an interesting rumination on language and what our own Kevin Keating calls “correctitude.”  I do admire the way the writer links  picking a relatively obscure and to (normal) people inconsequential grammatical nit to the idea that a person’s relationship to language can be predictive of their leadership. Here’s hoping, anyway.

(I’m Laurie and I’m a wordaholic. There. I said it. And I’m not ashamed.)

And the Oscar goes to…

bestpicture

I love the Oscar race and award shows in general I find them highly entertaining. Several Broadway alum’s are up for Oscars this year which is extremely exciting. Congratulations to Michael Shannon (from the Off-Broadway hit Bug) who gave an amazing, haunting and stirring performance in Revolutionary Road. Also a congratulations to Martin McDonagh (Broadway’s Lieutenant of Inishmore, nominated for In Bruges), Peter Morgan (Broadway’s Frost/Nixon, nominated for the film version), David Hare (Broadway’s Vertical Hour, nominated for The Reader) and John Patrick Shanley (Broadway’s Doubt, nominated for the film version). Now here are my predictions (and hopes) for the top Oscars:

Performance by an actor in a supporting role
Josh Brolin in Milk
Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder
Philip Seymour Hoffman in Doubt
Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight
Michael Shannon in Revolutionary Road

Will Win: Heath Ledger Should Win: Michael Shannon Should have been nominated: Emile Hirsch

Michael Shannon has several amazing scenes in Revolutionary Road that send shivers down your back. It is believable and real. Don’t get me wrong though, Heath Ledger’s performance as the Joker still haunts me.

Performance by an actress in a supporting role
Amy Adams in Doubt
Penélope Cruz in Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Viola Davis in Doubt
Taraji P. Henson in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Marisa Tomei in “The Wrestler”

Will Win: Viola Davis Should Win: Viola Davis Should have been Nominated: None

Viola Davis’ scene when she goes up against Meryl Streep. ’nuff said.

Performance by an actress in a leading role
Anne Hathaway in Rachel Getting Married
Angelina Jolie in Changeling
Melissa Leo in Frozen River
Meryl Streep in Doubt
Kate Winslet in The Reader

Will Win: Kate Winslet Should Win: Kate Winslet Should have been nominated: Cate Blanchett

Anne Hathaway, if she makes smart choices will eventually win an Oscar. Meryl Streep is amazing in everything she does but she did not originate her role. Kate Winslet is amazing and this is her 6th nomination and it is her year. She had two power house roles this year that were heartbreaking. It is finally her year

Performance by an actor in a leading role
Richard Jenkins in The Visitor
Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon
Sean Penn in Milk
Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler

Will Win: Mickey Rourke Should Win: Sean Penn Should have been Nominated: Clint Eastwood

Sean Penn should win. He is amazing as Harvey Milk and as you Milk you believe that it is actually Harvey Milk on screen. He should take the prize but who doesn’t like a come back story like Mickey Rourke’s.

Best motion picture of the year
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Frost/Nixon
Milk
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire

Will Win: Slumdog Millionaire Should Win: Milk Should have been Nominated: Revolutionary road

Slumdog Millionaire could be this years surprise win but I think that this is actually a touch perdiction. If you go by who is freshest on Rotten Tomatoes, Slumdog inches ahead of Milk by 3%. I hope Milk wins.

Bloomberg Guest-Posts on Official Google Blog

Mayor Bloomberg guest-posted on the Official Google Blog today.  He discussed ways New York City is making “it easier for both visitors and residents to explore all the energy, excitement and diversity of New York City’s five boroughs.”

Online, there’s nycgo.com, which uses Google Maps to help people to plan New York City vacations or staycations.

Offline, there’s the Official New York City Information Center at 810 Seventh Avenue, between 52nd and 53rd Streets.  But even “offline” is online: the Center features “interactive map tables” and a “gigantic video wall,” which both use Google technology.

Google and New York City: Perfect Together

It's Showtime!

The Broadway League has launched a new “economic stimulus” campaign via its website ILoveNYTheatre.com to help bring the butts to the seats. It’s a hip program that stresses the the fun, immediacy and affordability of seeing a show.  There are ads running in the NYT print, TV spots on WCBS and WABC, online  and phone kiosks around the city.  You can also see banner ads on NYT.com as well as the Times Square Alliance, NYC & Co sites. Here’s the tv commercial on Youtube, check it out–and while you’re at it, why not buy a ticket for something?

The New Website of Our Government

Barack Obama made history yesterday by becoming the first African American President. His entire campaign was flawless and can easily be a case study for a  marketing and advertising class. His internet marketing was especially brilliant. His YouTube page has had over 20,000,000 channel views (John McCain’s page has just over 2,000,000 views), and his Facebook Fan Page kept supporters (over 3,000,000) up-to-date with daily updates on the his upcoming events, appearances and speeches.

Barack Obama was lauded with having an amazingly seamless and beautiful website, far superior to any of his rivals. Obama is so web 2.0 that he instantly connected with the youth of our nation reaching out for support in very nontraditional ways. Obama has also started a new site, Change.gov allowing ordinary people to feel included into the happenings of the government.

This brings me to the new whitehouse.gov website. Obama and his team certainly understand the importance of branding because the new White House website matches the look and feel of change.gov, his youtube page, facebook page and campaign website. CNN.com posted an article about the website this morning. The website is very interactive including a blog and allowing people to contact the president via email (500 characters max. meaning you can only say “I love you” so many times). The website is so clean and sophisticated to puts past websites to shame. Here are a few screen shots from past Whitehouse.gov home pages.

December 1998 (Remember the internet was still new)

december-1998

July 2002

july-2002

June 2007

june-2007

The New Website – January 2009

january-2009

A Countdown to the End of an Error